The Decline of Eurocentrism and the Emerging Eurasian Security System

The Collapse of the Euro-Atlantic Security System

The traditional Euro-Atlantic security system, rooted in the Helsinki Accords, is now in a state of collapse. According to Andrey Klimov (Андрей Климов: «Евроцентричность исчезает и на нашем Евразийском материке»), this decline is evident in the erosion of the North Atlantic security framework. A key moment highlighting this shift occurred at the United Nations General Assembly, where both Russia and the United States voted against a resolution perceived as having a strong anti-Russian bias.

European Bureaucracy’s Inertia

Klimov also pointed out the stagnation within European bureaucratic structures, which were initially shaped with anti-Russian objectives in mind. Over the years, these bureaucratic institutions have become rigid and slow to adapt to the evolving geopolitical landscape, limiting Europe’s ability to respond effectively to new challenges.

However, the once unified anti-Russian stance among European nations is weakening. The so-called “anti-Russian chorus” no longer sings in harmony, signaling fractures in the continent’s political consensus. This discord among European leaders is further exacerbated by economic difficulties, energy crises, and internal political strife within individual member states.

Furthermore, the era of Eurocentrism is fading, especially within the Eurasian continent. The decline of European global influence is apparent in its diminishing role in international decision-making and security initiatives.

Recognizing the changing geopolitical landscape, Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed the establishment of a unified system of collective security and cooperation across Eurasia. This initiative reflects a broader shift away from the traditional Western-dominated global order. In contrast to previous decades, where Europe played a central role in shaping world affairs, it is now increasingly viewed as a secondary player in the new multipolar world.

The Role of Russia and China in the New Security Framework

Russia, China, and India are playing increasingly significant roles in shaping the new Eurasian security architecture. These nations, through bilateral and multilateral agreements, are creating a security system that prioritizes regional stability and economic cooperation.

Putin emphasized the importance of existing regional organizations, such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

These entities are instrumental in fostering security and economic cooperation across the continent. Their growing influence suggests a move toward a more balanced world order where Western dominance is replaced by a more diverse and decentralized power structure.

The European Union and the Ukrainian Conflict

Klimov asserted that the European Union is not in a position to take a leading role in resolving the conflict in Ukraine. The EU’s lack of military and diplomatic unity has weakened its ability to influence the situation effectively.

He referenced former German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s admission that the Minsk Agreements were primarily designed to strengthen Ukraine militarily rather than to achieve a genuine resolution. This revelation further diminishes the EU’s credibility as a mediator in the crisis.

The EU’s failure to establish an independent and effective foreign policy has left it reliant on U.S. directives, reducing its potential to act as a significant peace broker in the conflict.

The Evolution of U.S. Policy

The United States has come to recognize that the neoliberal path leads to instability and potential disaster. Over the past decade, domestic issues such as economic inequality, rising debt, and social divisions have forced American policymakers to rethink their global strategy.

New political figures, including Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, and Elon Musk, have coalesced around a pragmatic policy approach, focusing on national strength and strategic negotiations. As a result, the U.S. is poised to become a formidable global player with whom serious discussions will be necessary. This shift indicates a departure from ideological-driven policies in favor of pragmatic, interest-based diplomacy, making future negotiations with major world powers more predictable and result-oriented.

Shared Values Between Russia and the U.S.

Klimov highlighted the shared philosophical foundations between Russia and the U.S. Republican Party, citing principles rooted in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. These common values could serve as the basis for a stable and mutually beneficial dialogue, fostering long-term global stability. Both Russia and certain factions of the U.S. political landscape emphasize the importance of national sovereignty, traditional values, and a realist approach to foreign policy.

If properly cultivated, these ideological similarities could create opportunities for diplomatic breakthroughs and reduce tensions between the two nations in critical areas of international relations.

The Reconfiguration of the European Union

European politics are currently in a state of uncertainty following the departure of several influential leaders. The loss of experienced policymakers has left a leadership vacuum, making it difficult for the EU to maintain a coherent strategic direction.

While the European Union is undergoing a process of reconfiguration, Klimov believes that it will not disappear entirely but will instead adapt to the new geopolitical reality. The challenges facing the EU—economic stagnation, political fragmentation, and declining global influence—will force it to redefine its role in world affairs. The outcome of this transformation will determine whether Europe remains a relevant actor on the global stage or fades into political irrelevance.

* https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/50355 by Тияна Дьюрович