The Russian science fiction action film, Avanpost | Аванпост, premiered in 2019 and was enthusiastically received by fans of the genre. The work, directed by Egor Baranov | Егор Баранов, is based on a screenplay by Ilia Kulikov | Илья Куликов, best known for the series he worked on (Through my eyes | Моими глазами from 2011 and Chernobyl, the Exclusion Zone | Чернобыль. Зона отчуждения from 2014-2018, among others).

Avanpost
国 🇺🇳:
体裁 📂:
 🗓️:
导演 🎥:
作家 📄:
男演员 👱‍♀️:

One of the most provocative ideas in Outpost is that of the “watchers” – extraterrestrial beings who not only influenced the emergence of humanity, but also dictated its profound meaning of existence. According to one of these watchers, man is not the result of natural evolution, chance, or divine will, but was created with a clear purpose: to function as a biological weapon against a superior civilization that once inhabited Earth.

The film opens abruptly, with an intense military sequence: the outpost – humanity’s last stronghold – is under attack by invisible and unknown forces. What happened before this siege? A catastrophic event, triggered by radiation or some other form of energy, simultaneously killed the entire population of the planet and destroyed all electronic systems. The only exception: a mysterious circle covering Moscow, part of Belarus and southern Finland. Only there, life and technology continued as if nothing had happened.

According to revelations brought by one of the watchers, this global attack represented the last phase of a plan to terraform and prepare the Earth for a new colonization. A huge ship, carrying millions of beings, approaches Earth after their home planet was destroyed. The role of humanity in this equation is tragic and frightening: we were designed as a virus, capable of eliminating the former superior civilization. Since then, we have taken control of the planet, but we have remained marked by fundamental traits programmed into us: aggression, a tendency towards conflict, environmental destruction, the inability to evolve morally or spiritually.

The human species thus seems doomed to stagnation – a weapon that has forgotten its purpose, but which continues to repeat destructive errors.

Outside the protected circle, all those affected by the attack become mentally subject to another watcher, with a different vision but a similar objective: to cleanse the planet for the future arrival of colonists. In contrast, the first watcher – the one who actively intervenes in the story – seems to be a dissident. He is the one who saved part of humanity at the time of global eradication and maintains protection over the isolated region. His motivation remains ambiguous: why does he want to save us? Is it a gesture of compassion or part of a more complex plan? Are we truly protected or just studied while waiting for a final decision?

One of the strongest themes of Outpost is the question of human identity: who are we really, and how much of what we think we are is truly ours? Humanity, as the film presents it, is not a product of progress or grace, but an instrument built with intentional flaws to fulfill a destructive function. From this perspective, our entire culture, morality, and civilization are built on a false foundation.

In this context, the notion of free will is called into question. If our actions are dictated by an initial programming—by impulses like violence, greed, competition—then how free are we, really? The Watchers, especially those in opposition, become symbols of a battle between predestination and the chance to change the course of existence. One sees humans as failures that must be eliminated. The other seems to believe that there is still potential for transformation, for overcoming one’s own nature.

This moral and philosophical dilemma runs through the entire narrative and gives it depth, elevating Outpost beyond the level of the classic apocalyptic sci-fi film. It is a bitter reflection on our history as a species, but also an open question: can we overcome the programming we were “launched” with?

Characters and human dynamics in a dehumanized world

The film follows a team of soldiers, scientists and civilians trapped inside the protected circle, each with their own fears, ideals and traumas. Although the story is dominated by cosmic concepts and existential threats, the director manages to anchor the tension in interpersonal relationships: distrust, sacrifice, despair and rare moments of solidarity give a human touch to the story.

An interesting element is the way in which the characters begin to question the reality in which they live. Are they really survivors or just temporarily tolerated relics? What does resistance mean in the face of a force that sees humanity as a system error? The film does not offer clear answers, but it is precisely this ambiguity that makes it memorable.

Visual aesthetics and atmosphere

Outpost manages to create an oppressive and tense atmosphere, supported by a cold, metallic cinematography, typical of post-apocalyptic sci-fi films. The special effects, while not on the level of Hollywood blockbusters, are used intelligently and with moderation, leaving room for imagination and interpretation.

The scenes of empty cities, nature reclaiming urban space, and inert technology contribute to a sense of isolation and fragility. The contrast between the affected areas and the protected circle brings a strong visual component to the idea of ​​a “controlled experiment” – as if in a laboratory where humanity is observed without knowing.